Text: If a particular word is used in different parts of a statute, there is a presumption that the word is used in the same sense throughout. This was so held in Boghilal Pandya v. State of Bombay and followed in other cases as well. Lord MacDermott pointed out that this principle was to ensure an orderly and consistent use of language (Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd v. Boarland.
Summary: But this presumption has been held to be a weak one and readily displaced by the context (Shamrao Vishnu Parulekar v. District Magistrate). As rightly pointed by Lord Scarman, it would be perilous to assume that an English word of ordinary usage is to express only one particular meaning (Infabrics Ltd v. Jaytex Ltd).
Quote: Indeed, every definition section starts with the words “unless the context otherwise requires”, which indicates that the given definition need not necessarily apply if it needs to be given a different meaning.
tester
Blurb: Nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to any property acquired by way of gift or under a will or any other instrument or under a decree or order of a civil court or under an award where the terms of the gift, will or other instrument or the decree, order or award prescribe a restricted estate in such property.
Question: Explanation: In this subsection, “property” includes……
Answer: “14. Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property
Q: Explanation: In this subsection, “property” includes?
A: Arvind P Datar is a Senior Advocate of the Madras High Court.
Read the Latest Agriculture News in Marathi & Watch Agriculture videos on Agrowon. Get the Latest Farming Updates on Market Intelligence, Market updates, Bazar Bhav, Animal Care, Weather Updates and Farmer Success Stories in Marathi.
Home Page
dfgsdfg